Thank you. Yes, I tried to get that link into my text; but I seem to be limited at present to what you saw. Sorry. What is intriguing is that if you put in the link I cited you get - well, I get - a summary of the case drawn from what Hess says, which bears no relation to what it was all about. How to define the 'books' - as a circuit judge I say Hess shld not be in the books anyway - when that happens?
Thank you. Yes, I tried to get that link into my text; but I seem to be limited at present to what you saw. Sorry. What is intriguing is that if you put in the link I cited you get - well, I get - a summary of the case drawn from what Hess says, which bears no relation to what it was all about. How to define the 'books' - as a circuit judge I say Hess shld not be in the books anyway - when that happens?
This is the correct link to the judgment: https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/OJ/2023/43.html