Although some of this is addressed to me and asks if I had read it you did not do me the courtesy of notifying me of it either before or upon publication, which I might have expected from a fellow professional given the insinuation of recklessness and misleading conduct. I have read it after that you have belatedly notified me by email this morning. Other than to note that the misspelling of ‘belated’ is yours not mine (a reckless typo?) I am not sure any further response is either necessary or worth my time.
I can see you might see an insinuation of misleading etc. I am sorry I failed to come up to your expectation of what a fellow professional should do. I'll not burden this reply with what I actually notified you by email: namely what is set out in my comment to J Rozenberg at https://rozenberg.substack.com/p/the-perils-of-legal-ai/comments . This concerned the subject (nothing directly to do with you) of contempt and the misleader advocate.
Although some of this is addressed to me and asks if I had read it you did not do me the courtesy of notifying me of it either before or upon publication, which I might have expected from a fellow professional given the insinuation of recklessness and misleading conduct. I have read it after that you have belatedly notified me by email this morning. Other than to note that the misspelling of ‘belated’ is yours not mine (a reckless typo?) I am not sure any further response is either necessary or worth my time.
I can see you might see an insinuation of misleading etc. I am sorry I failed to come up to your expectation of what a fellow professional should do. I'll not burden this reply with what I actually notified you by email: namely what is set out in my comment to J Rozenberg at https://rozenberg.substack.com/p/the-perils-of-legal-ai/comments . This concerned the subject (nothing directly to do with you) of contempt and the misleader advocate.
I have tried to explain the law on this more fully at https://dburrows.substack.com/p/interim-restraint-and-property-protection: eg in your blogs there is no mention of Civil Procedure Act 1997 and search orders; or of SCA 1981 s 34 and production by the police?